Tea Party / Occupy Wall Street: It’s not right or left

The Occupy Wall Street has taken off. What began as a seemingly quirky group of young people has started to gather interest with more established groups. I read this morning that some of the labor unions have taken an interest in it, possibly adding some financial backing. Although people have come from around the country to be a part of it, other “Occupy” groups have popped up around the nation.

The Democratic Party isn’t sure what to do with it.  I hope they don’t try to co-opt it.

Is this a leftist version of the Tea Party?  That also began in a seemingly ad hoc manner.  They have since been co-opted by the Republican party and have been very successful in pulling the party further to the right.  (As someone generally on the left, I’m just amazed that they can keep moving rightward.)

I read both of them as the flip side of the same record.  (For those who are reading this and are not sure about the last reference, please ask your grandparents.)  While the Tea Party rails against government, claiming it’s too large and intrusive, Occupy Wall Street rails against corporate power.  They both have songs in which the common denominator of their lyrics lament the overwhelming power of institutions to the point where the average person seems completely disconnected from them.  None of these institutions appear to operate with everyone’s best interest in mind.

Honestly, the Tea Party, as much as I think they’re politically wrong, is socially right.  The government doesn’t function in a way that makes its citizens believes it cares about their lives.  Government regulation just gets in the way.  Without too much difficulty, we can all probably identify at least one or two regulations that are superfluous if we relied upon common sense.

While I believe government is necessary, especially to protect the average person from powers that can crush them, it has gotten in bed with corporate interests that don’t have our interests at heart.  Consider the financial collapse in 2008.  Honest reflection subsequent to the bailouts would have acknowledged that tighter regulations were necessary to prevent such an economic calamity from happening again.  Yet, those are not in place yet.

But blaming government for this disconnect is only a part of it.  We cannot overlook the gross disparities in wealth accumulation over the last few decades and the obscene disparities in income between those who work at the top of a large corporation and those who work at the bottom.  The multiples between the highest executive and the lowest employee are not 10:1 or 15:1 or 25:1 or even 100:1.  They’re exceeding 300:1, sometimes 400:1.  I would be hard-pressed to acknowledge that companies with such pay inequity see their employees as people with real lives.  Rather, their employees have become another expenditure, an expendable cog in their profit making machine.

Indeed, with globalization and the internet, companies can seek the lowest cost producer across the globe.  It is ironic that the president asked Jeff Immelt of GE to serve on his competitive council to re-invigorate job growth in the United States, while GE has no hesitation using off-shore low cost producers.

Think about this for a moment.  During the 1980s, corporations closed factories in this country and moved those operations to places like China to take advantage of lower production costs.  Today, with low-cost communication options, corporations can do the same with knowledge jobs.  In other words, why pay an accountant to work in the United States when for the same cost a company can get five accountants in Mexico or India or Brazil?

No one wants to be seen as not mattering.  No one wants to be considered expendable or disposable.  Yet, that’s what’s happening.  Our daily struggles don’t seem to matter to the government.  Our lives don’t really matter to the corporations, either.

The Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street have their origins in grassroots disenchantment with the way things are.  The Tea Party by virtue of time and co-opting by the GOP establishment has become more disciplined with its message.  Occupy Wall Street is still emerging.  Both, however, came together not focused on one issue, but in response to a free-floating anxiety over our collective future.

Their existence tells me a couple of things.  First, people are not as hopeful about their future as they were several years ago.  They’re worried.  They would like to have some control over the future of their own lives.  Second, existing institutions aren’t working for them anymore.

Honestly, I’m not sure what’s going to emerge.  But I do know that I want our institutional leadership, whether it’s in government or industry, to recognize that there are a lot of people in this nation who are disenchanted or becoming disenchanted with what’s going on.  There’s no clear word or sign to say specifically what to do, but what’s clear is we don’t want to be ignored, overlooked, or tossed out.

Advertisements

About Quentin Chin

Eclectic interests: religion, technology, food, music, current events. I live in the reality-based world.
This entry was posted in Current Events and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Tea Party / Occupy Wall Street: It’s not right or left

  1. Rick says:

    Quentin, this is a great post. I think that more should be made of the parallels between these two groups. Though I’m more inclined to agree with the anti-Wall Streeters, I think both groups are using simplistic demonization. The facts are much more nuanced and complicated. The difference, though, is that there are a lot more facts on the anti-Wall Street side.

  2. Quentin Chin says:

    I’m with you. There are far more complex arguments to make for both positions, although the public positions that have emerged from the Tea Party strike me as really simplistic and not grounded in any empirical reality. The jury is still out on the Occupy Wall Street crowd.

    Still, though, these groups are a public manifestations of a growing sense of frustration and powerlessness. Ironically, we’ve allowed it to happen to us without even knowing. For instance, we want consumer goods at low prices, but we don’t really question where they’re made. We like the convenience of purchasing products on-line and then wonder why our local stores are going out of business. We want government programs as long as someone else pays for them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s